Post by MyName999 » Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:37 am
To me to give some apologies, maybe my Frenglish made you understand that I'm in a "against-gold spender crusade", I wanna just say to each of you, DirtySouth, KingEvo that I'm/will be playing with,..., that it's wrong...
I did already spent gold, not a lot, and to take an advantage: prestige while sending 4 scholars to a 12h trip against a guy that bought truce while giving me names due to my offense,... Resources boosters to recruit more troops during second week of a world opening, ... Let the one that never spent throw me the rock!!! Lol
I'm not against any gold spender, I already defended them, I'm only saying that with the new TBS wolrds, this has to be examined in order that winning a world can't be bought, because it's not the way a game must be...
I gave this example not saying "Uhoh the bad guy" but to show something that can be easily seen. And this huge enormous example is the beginning of something that can lead to a uniniteresting game where only great spender could play, what will not appear as these people like to play against skilled guys too, and that the only that will stay will be people that can often spend large amount of money to play virtual game (so don't knowing real money value, what I call the son-of-his-daddy oppositely to the large amount of proletarian I do represent that have to work hardly to earn money and so prefear using it to pay holidays than looking at our screen)...
I just hope you saw some "humour" in my sentences, not hate ;-P
My warning is given to Quark in order them to see that keeping the game interesting is primordial, them to learn about the errors they already made in w100 for example. My warning IS NOT given to gold spender...
I hope I've clarified my opinion now...
Maybe just PWN or Orlor opinion about this could contribute to the debate???
To me to give some apologies, maybe my Frenglish made you understand that I'm in a "against-gold spender crusade", I wanna just say to each of you, DirtySouth, KingEvo that I'm/will be playing with,..., that it's wrong...
I did already spent gold, not a lot, and to take an advantage: prestige while sending 4 scholars to a 12h trip against a guy that bought truce while giving me names due to my offense,... Resources boosters to recruit more troops during second week of a world opening, ... Let the one that never spent throw me the rock!!! Lol
I'm not against any gold spender, I already defended them, I'm only saying that with the new TBS wolrds, this has to be examined in order that winning a world can't be bought, because it's not the way a game must be...
I gave this example not saying "Uhoh the bad guy" but to show something that can be easily seen. And this huge enormous example is the beginning of something that can lead to a uniniteresting game where only great spender could play, what will not appear as these people like to play against skilled guys too, and that the only that will stay will be people that can often spend large amount of money to play virtual game (so don't knowing real money value, what I call the son-of-his-daddy oppositely to the large amount of proletarian I do represent that have to work hardly to earn money and so prefear using it to pay holidays than looking at our screen)...
I just hope you saw some "humour" in my sentences, not hate ;-P
My warning is given to Quark in order them to see that keeping the game interesting is primordial, them to learn about the errors they already made in w100 for example. My warning IS NOT given to gold spender...
I hope I've clarified my opinion now...
Maybe just PWN or Orlor opinion about this could contribute to the debate???