Troop deployment versus support

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
:) :confused: :mad: :( :p ;) :D :o :rolleyes: :cool: :eek:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Troop deployment versus support

Post by mikeysee » Sat Oct 20, 2012 9:20 pm

Jackhamer wrote:Yeah, think about the ridiculousness of attacking someone with 100K zerks. That requires no strategy,

He said the city would have to be able to feed the troops, and nobody can feed 100k zerks

Post by Jackhamer » Sat Oct 20, 2012 11:57 am

Yeah, think about the ridiculousness of attacking someone with 100K zerks. That requires no strategy,

Post by Brendone » Fri Oct 19, 2012 1:07 pm

1. This is the wrong forum. See the suggestions forum.
2. This has been suggested before, and in general is looked on negatively (too easy to quickly mount forward attacks I guess).

Troop deployment versus support

Post by Rhagrok » Fri Oct 19, 2012 12:48 pm

Being able to move troops to a city versus just supporting the city would allow for much better support. City deployed to would of course have to be able to feed the troops.

Top