Post by JGree » Sun Jul 15, 2012 7:31 pm
Pauld2468 wrote:Speaking of real world warfare i had the privelege of visiting both hiroshima and pearl harbour during the same trip.
i had concluded from those two events that the USA were indeed cowards after the japanese had fought with honor and courage on the attack on pearl harbour only attacking and killin mosly the US own troops.
Then a few years later the US decides to kill millions of inocent women and children who had no part of WWII by dropping nuclear bombs on hiroshima then another days later on nagasaki to end the war.
I ask Is that expoliding a weakness on the japanese or is it being cowardly on the US side by ending a war with such destuction that by the other normal military means the US had no chance of winning the war with there own armies and navy personel. So they must of thought how about we kill everyone by nuking them.
Just because you can use a chaos exploit in pre worlds doesnt mean you should rely on it to get you out of your own poor planning
Umm, the U.S. was going to win the war against Japan no matter what had happened, U.S. and allied forces had taken all islands but the mainland of Japan. They had superior forces and technology (nuclear bomb/radar), and the Japanese, yes, were loyal and honorable to their emperor. It is possible every single soldier would die befor he was harmed. It is highly debated weather it was MORALY correct to nuke them, not that the U.S. was cornered and resorted to unconventional warfare methods. Get your facts straight.
I can't explain the final attacks on Japan to a 5 year old any clearer, Pauld. Anyone can vouch this is what happened. If you want to read specifics, actually listen in school about WWII, or don't even talk at all.
[quote="Pauld2468"]Speaking of real world warfare i had the privelege of visiting both hiroshima and pearl harbour during the same trip.
i had concluded from those two events that the USA were indeed cowards after the japanese had fought with honor and courage on the attack on pearl harbour only attacking and killin mosly the US own troops.
Then a few years later the US decides to kill millions of inocent women and children who had no part of WWII by dropping nuclear bombs on hiroshima then another days later on nagasaki to end the war.
I ask Is that expoliding a weakness on the japanese or is it being cowardly on the US side by ending a war with such destuction that by the other normal military means the US had no chance of winning the war with there own armies and navy personel. So they must of thought how about we kill everyone by nuking them.
Just because you can use a chaos exploit in pre worlds doesnt mean you should rely on it to get you out of your own poor planning[/quote]
Umm, the U.S. was going to win the war against Japan no matter what had happened, U.S. and allied forces had taken all islands but the mainland of Japan. They had superior forces and technology (nuclear bomb/radar), and the Japanese, yes, were loyal and honorable to their emperor. It is possible every single soldier would die befor he was harmed. It is highly debated weather it was MORALY correct to nuke them, not that the U.S. was cornered and resorted to unconventional warfare methods. Get your facts straight.
I can't explain the final attacks on Japan to a 5 year old any clearer, Pauld. Anyone can vouch this is what happened. If you want to read specifics, actually listen in school about WWII, or don't even talk at all.