Coalition tab + forum

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
:) :confused: :mad: :( :p ;) :D :o :rolleyes: :cool: :eek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Coalition tab + forum

Post by IdesOfMach » Mon Jun 04, 2012 3:27 am

How would the objectives be set, who would set them, and how would you distribute the rewards upon completion?

Sounds like this would require a complete overhaul of the game.

Post by Fire820 » Sun Jun 03, 2012 9:48 pm

Ok. Then I could see that working. Cool

Post by Tooltip » Sun Jun 03, 2012 9:42 pm

As I mentioned previously,
1) The forum is automatically deleted on dissolution. If you reform the coalition, you have to reform the forums too.
2) Reforming the Coalition takes resources
3) Lowered rewards for reforming Coalitions with the same guild or the same objective

Post by Fire820 » Sun Jun 03, 2012 9:26 pm

Unfortunately though, a coalition has become more of a huge alliance. My only problem with your idea tooltip is this: what would stop the leaders from reforming the "coalition" to have an extended time on the forum

Post by Tooltip » Sun Jun 03, 2012 9:20 pm

A coalition is a temporary alliance for the mutal completion of an objective.

Ideally you should only be able to form a coalition with your enemies. The coalition should include its own Tab, Forum, and Chat Room.

1) Time limit to accomplish objective before dissolution (forum and chat room is deleted)
2) Coalition tax: It takes more resources to keep a coalition war machine going, and just as much to start it
3) Add rewards for completing objectives. Completing objectives with different guilds results in better rewards.
4) Quest system and Valor2.0 friendly: Acomplish Quests and Competitions by regularly forming different Coalitions with different objectives

Heh, if you combine it with my bounty idea, you could seem some unusual match ups.

Post by Fire820 » Sun Jun 03, 2012 8:31 pm

The ally number limit wouldn't work. There would be the unspoken alliances. It's obvious they're an ally but it's not in diplomacy. And the letters. People would find a way. Next thing you know, there will be vVv,VVv,VVV,vvV, etc. all obviously in the same coalition.

Post by Rats » Sat Jun 02, 2012 6:55 pm

Well since valor 2.0 is coming out maybe guilds could only have 3-4 allies and guilds can't have there first letters of their name the same as any other guild except allies just a thought

Post by Deano87 » Sat Jun 02, 2012 5:17 pm

All they do is bully smaller guilds into forcing them to join or be taken out. There's no real epic battles anymore, and the only way to counter them is to make a coalition against there's. BORING. Only three big powers in 1 worlds, that's ment to happen older worlds. Like W22 there is only 4 big guilds left.

Post by ChichWarrior14 » Sat Jun 02, 2012 2:34 pm

@deano dude that would be awesome! I run guilds on every world I join. I NEVER join alliances like TKA, BOA or vVv. It's annoying that they just have giant guilds with kakao chat rooms. It's unfair and I think Valor should make it that guilds can't have the first few letters in common. This would help

Post by Deano87 » Sat Jun 02, 2012 8:16 am

It will make it too easy for coalitions to run the worlds an do what they like. It's already ruined how people play this game. I remember when it was each guild for themselves and maybe one or to allies. Now those were the days.

Top