You Win

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
:) :confused: :mad: :( :p ;) :D :o :rolleyes: :cool: :eek:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: You Win

Post by awsomator » Fri Jul 27, 2012 4:27 am

I think that there should be a no guild world and I know people will work around it until a pop up that world ends in xsays top player gets x reward and wins the world.then no guilds and alliances turn on each other so every man for themselves and there's a big battle and the world ends.Or all guilds automatically disband with a world entering it's last month.

Post by TheCrusher1195 » Fri Jul 27, 2012 1:28 am

It could be time speed ups, i mean there is nothing better than starting a brand new world with speed ups, the troops thing is a bit too futuristic for medieval times. And 500 cities.... Dang that is unbelievably unmanageable. The timer things sounds good, but players shoul be encouraged to fight, perhaps "the world will end in 10 days" "top players x will recieve rewards" If that doesnt stir the crowd up, i dont know what will.

Post by Fire820 » Thu Jul 26, 2012 6:49 pm

Yes but in any world how many people buy gold. And you don't have to "keep up" with the gold users. As I said, many top people don't use gold.

Post by Swingfirst » Thu Jul 26, 2012 9:28 am

I don't agree with gold. Anyone can buy gold. The ability to access unique units or building which might, in the beginning, enable you to "keep up" with a gold user would be more significant.

Post by Fire820 » Thu Jul 26, 2012 7:13 am

Except that lots of people who are strong forces, don't use gold. So it gives an incentive to play

Post by JGree » Thu Jul 26, 2012 4:31 am

I don't think allowing one person to win several worlds would be fair, and giving hold would be upsetting more of the balance between gold and non gold users.

Post by Fire820 » Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:11 pm

I understand your point. Now, if you're talking about the reward being in that world, great! A fourth level in one city or even a handful, great! But when you get permanent support from accomplishments in the beginning of a world, that does throw the balance off. If it's temporary though, sounds great! Maybe add another medal even with maybe a gold amount with it?

Post by Swingfirst » Wed Jul 25, 2012 12:59 pm

The reason for the awards I stated are so others can see your accomplishments.

Once you have people with 100 cities or more, one no longer matters. So your Capitol can get a fourth level of zerker, who cares? I have fifty cities building level three! So you get one Royal Guard from your portal per day, or even every 6 hours. Who cares? I have 40 cities making guardians. It's not going to tip the scales. It's more like "wow, I've never seen that before. How did you get it?"

They will know you accomplished something.

Post by awsomator » Wed Jul 25, 2012 2:26 am

JudgeDredge are you gonna check in at W30 anytime soon?

Post by JudgeDredge » Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:24 pm

In world 12 there is a player with over 1300 citys and over 30 miliion points.
Crazy ?!!

Top