Quark Games forums

Then make it so I can support a player but not a barb if its that big of an issue. But I think supporting a barb isn't bad, if say you want the barb but are waiting for a scholar to be ready you can protect your claim.
But that's a different issue. I want to support non-guild friends.

I think spiking barbs is a good idea and adds a new dynamic into the game that should have NEVER been taken out.

They originally took it away because players were supporting barbarian cities they were farming

[quote="pizzaking"]Same with attacking.
When I need to waste troops for not keeping the grass green enough I have no other way to get rid of them except hitting random players. I'd like to just tell a guild mate and send them their way.[/quote]

Lol its way more fun to send 25 attacks of 5-20 troops to an enemy from different cities close by and see them freak out about the attack lol.

I did this also to an allied city no biggie once he knew what i was doing

But i do agree with the previous posts.

Same with attacking.
When I need to waste troops for not keeping the grass green enough I have no other way to get rid of them except hitting random players. I'd like to just tell a guild mate and send them their way.

I agree.. We should be able to support the enemy if we wanted to. (Not that I would).
But when things go down and you have multiple guilds helping. Its nice to support them if they need it.

I would like to see a change in he game. I feel we should be allowed to support players that are not in our guild. For example, I have a friendly guild asking for assistane, yet I am unable to help them by sending troops. I think if I make the troops, I should get to use them as I see fit.
Other than that, you've made a great game! Keep it up!
Cheers