Diplomacy Requests

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
:) :confused: :mad: :( :p ;) :D :o :rolleyes: :cool: :eek:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Diplomacy Requests

Post by MagicPie » Tue Jul 17, 2012 4:39 am

Ya taking out a piece of paper with words on it won't stop people from attacking you.

You " this piece of paper says we are allies and you signed it!!"

Me " I don't give a damn I'm taking your cities!!!! Attack!!!!!"

No point.

Post by LordFirefall » Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:36 pm

In real life, agreements between kingdoms (countries) are broken all the time. Frequently, it results in war. This is a war game, hence...

Post by donut » Fri Jul 13, 2012 3:59 pm

You all must always keep in mind that Valor is a realistic game. In real life if you had a agreement and somebody denied it, you could prove it to them with a piece of paper or by other means.

Post by Fire820 » Fri Jul 13, 2012 2:39 pm

Ok. Like you said, a diplomacy is between two guilds. So guild A is not going to NAP guild B unless both agree to it. Unless there's a spy that is. And then you have a bigger problem than a bad diplomacy.

Post by Theassassin17 » Fri Jul 13, 2012 2:22 pm

its better than not knowing. if you and another guild have established an NAP it means that you both are in agreement. At the moment anyone with diplomacy privileges can make an NAP without anyone knowing. You could be under the impression that they will not attack, then out of nowhere an attack where you least expect it. You cant have one sided diplomacy, it just doesn't work that way.

Post by LordFirefall » Thu Jul 12, 2012 1:52 pm

How would this enhance game play or increase flexibilty over what we have now? I just don't see how you having an "Official Document" to cover your NAP is going to do anything magical. If a guild decides to break a NAP and attack you, is this document going to cause them to stop attacking and apologize? Are you proposing some sort of penalty if someone break the NAP?

Post by donut » Thu Jul 12, 2012 1:41 pm

Better game play. More official documents. More flexibility.

Post by LordFirefall » Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:15 pm

Which would accomplish what?

Post by donut » Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:01 pm

But it's not official. Actually you know what would be fun?

If instead of having diplomacy, people should be allowed to write their own agreement and get the other guild to agree to it.

The agreement could say anything the writer wants. It could be free trade, NAP, merge, sister guild, it could be absolutely any agreement.

And if the other guild signed it but denied signing it, you could take it out and show them.

Post by LordFirefall » Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:37 pm

I consider the intrigue of not knowing part of the fun.

Top