Quark Games forums

Here's on I used a couple weeks ago. Player:Why are you attacking me? Me:I'm just burning troops. Player:Ok but please only attack this city and target the hiding place with your ballista not anything else (idiot doesn't realize you can't lol) Me:Ok well make sure you keep your city full of troops. ...

NO no no no and no. Way too easy to attack. If you want precision timing do it by your own skill. That's what seperates the good from the bad in times of war.

I like your idea fhorar. Especialy using scholar type units to merge cities. And I think cities should be maxed out fully to merge together. lvl 2 acedemy sounds good too.

It doesn't take 6 hours to go through 288 cities. I can go through that amount in 2 hours and do what needs to be done. There should be an end game for a guild not 1 player. And to even battle it out with two people that have over 500 cities would take forever and probably never happen. Plus that is...

To win a world it should be determined by how much % of the world your guild controlls in every region. If not all regions then a x number of regions.

That's stupid to think that after all that time playing with your guild you would turn on each other. This game is about playing and working together in a guild, after a while you become friends like the people I play with in w22. We play still because we have fun chatting and planning together. The...

Don't play the game then, valor doesn't need sooky players anyway.

I like 1,2 and 4. Very good practical use of things.

Could we get a date on when a world has been opened and how many days, months, or years it's been going for. Im in world 22 and we,ve been wondering exactly how long it's been since w started. We guessed around 20 months.

I think there are other ways to save time with the number of cities problem.