Attention quark and valorians
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 5:53 am
Hello fellow Valorians:
Recently the crowns of the 3 allied guild of W319 approached Quark asking for a difficult thing. We requested an additional 50 spots for the winners circle. Yes we know there are already 150 spots for the winning guilds. As the first legacy world many of Valors past and present champions jumped at the chance to play an "old school" world. Many of the names seen in W319 are hardcore players stretching back to World 2. Want to know what is missed most about "old school" worlds? The fact we didn't have to pick which friends were the most beneficial in a fight and the fact we didn't have break alliances and hurt relationships for a win. If you look at the kill scores in W319 compared to other legacy worlds that alone will tell you that all players even those capped out by the remaining guilds put up an amazing fight. W319 is just now wrapping up when other legacy worlds have come and gone. If Quark would look at how much gold was used on that world compared to other legacy worlds, they would see that W319 is an exception to other legacy worlds and we have paid our dues.
Now we were told that an exception would not be granted and thus leaving us to ask our hardcore fighters to give up spots to make it as fair as possible to all the allied guilds involved. Then a poll is presented asking if old worlds should be closed. I thought we were told old worlds would remain open and they have an option where you can vote to receive a medal as well? Is this not changing winning conditions after a world has started?
I'm petitioning that W319 be granted an additional 50 winning spots so that all us allies can finish together: the way it should be. Please feel free to comment and let Quark know how you feel about this situation.
Recently the crowns of the 3 allied guild of W319 approached Quark asking for a difficult thing. We requested an additional 50 spots for the winners circle. Yes we know there are already 150 spots for the winning guilds. As the first legacy world many of Valors past and present champions jumped at the chance to play an "old school" world. Many of the names seen in W319 are hardcore players stretching back to World 2. Want to know what is missed most about "old school" worlds? The fact we didn't have to pick which friends were the most beneficial in a fight and the fact we didn't have break alliances and hurt relationships for a win. If you look at the kill scores in W319 compared to other legacy worlds that alone will tell you that all players even those capped out by the remaining guilds put up an amazing fight. W319 is just now wrapping up when other legacy worlds have come and gone. If Quark would look at how much gold was used on that world compared to other legacy worlds, they would see that W319 is an exception to other legacy worlds and we have paid our dues.
Now we were told that an exception would not be granted and thus leaving us to ask our hardcore fighters to give up spots to make it as fair as possible to all the allied guilds involved. Then a poll is presented asking if old worlds should be closed. I thought we were told old worlds would remain open and they have an option where you can vote to receive a medal as well? Is this not changing winning conditions after a world has started?
I'm petitioning that W319 be granted an additional 50 winning spots so that all us allies can finish together: the way it should be. Please feel free to comment and let Quark know how you feel about this situation.