Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 4:59 am
In a guild when one key player falls, the rest goes together.
Yes what you said there would work, but it only applies:
1) If you can memories all the KSD of the "nearby" enemy players (Nearby could be even 6-10 hours away). This requires you to be very active to collect adequate information;
2) If you divert attack troops to the person who support, you also reduce the attacking troops on the current target. Hence, all it takes is for the supporting player to pull back troops to defense whilst the old targeted player helps out. This would actually increase the interaction between players further and make this game even more interesting;
3) Even you are so active and smart and collect enough information to find out who's in support. How do you know which city the troops came from? And which city would you choose to be your new target city? i.e. I have 25 cities in one world now and if I am supporting a player at the front line, which city out of the 25 you are going to target? or just send fakes to all which I may simply ignore?
Considering all the above, I support the change.
Yes what you said there would work, but it only applies:
1) If you can memories all the KSD of the "nearby" enemy players (Nearby could be even 6-10 hours away). This requires you to be very active to collect adequate information;
2) If you divert attack troops to the person who support, you also reduce the attacking troops on the current target. Hence, all it takes is for the supporting player to pull back troops to defense whilst the old targeted player helps out. This would actually increase the interaction between players further and make this game even more interesting;
3) Even you are so active and smart and collect enough information to find out who's in support. How do you know which city the troops came from? And which city would you choose to be your new target city? i.e. I have 25 cities in one world now and if I am supporting a player at the front line, which city out of the 25 you are going to target? or just send fakes to all which I may simply ignore?
Considering all the above, I support the change.