Page 1 of 2
Ballistas vs Rams to Destroy Walls
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:18 am
by ArmandoJCA
Since both Ballistas and Rams can destroy walls. Is one better than the other at destroying walls? What is the advantage of the latter?
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 1:44 am
by Kev265
Use the simulation on rally point and find out ...
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 2:17 pm
by Purduepilot
I actually question this as well. It only takes 550 rams to destroy a level 25 wall, but with a ballista target level of 25 it requires closer to 800. This doesn't make much sense if this is actually how many are required to take down a wall of this level however. Because the ballista strength is far superior to that of the ram. Unless the simulator is inaccurate, or there is a bonus rams get, technically the ballista should be superior.
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 11:47 pm
by Purduepilot
Anybody else have any insight into this?
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 12:06 am
by Killerxx777
Well, rams are made particularly to destroy walls so they should be superior don't you think?
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 6:29 am
by Purduepilot
I do agree with you that it would make sense because they are specialized. However, I guess I'm just stuck on the stats, that ballistas are 8X stronger on offensive.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 7:52 am
by Mr. O
I honestly have no idea as to which is the better method of destroying a wall in an enemy city. Given the mechanics that are presented it isnt 100% clear as to which is better to use specifically against a given wall level.
I will try and take a look at this over the next few days.
Also - Purduepilot, that is a good question, sorry it took me a few days to see it. You know how it is with the holidays. :-) Family comes first.
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 8:24 am
by RumatO
Any news this situation?
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 7:47 pm
by Tooltip
Perhaps there is a hidden stat. Attack may apply only to troop vs troop.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:23 am
by RumatO
Unhide it
(to programmers) please.