Ideal First City To Conquer

Discuss or develop strategies here!

What's your ideal first city to conquer?

You may select 1 option

 
 
View results

User avatar
Mr. O
Scholar
Posts: 385
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 7:03 am
Location: USA

Postby Mr. O » Wed Nov 16, 2011 7:25 pm

LuckyHermit - The vBulletin default filter has some strict requirements in relation to parsing text. As the forum is still quite new and has only just been released, give it some time to get all the kinks out of it.

LordHades77
Lancer
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 9:06 am
Location: New York City

Postby LordHades77 » Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:38 am

I believe it's best to capture a 7-10k Barb city from a player who quit. This way it's quicker to get that city to start building scholars. Hopefully u can find one within 3 hrs range. Awesome Poll Btw.
Lord of the Underworld,

HADES!

TunchKhan
Lancer
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 9:49 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Contact:

Postby TunchKhan » Sat Nov 19, 2011 10:18 pm

LordHades77 wrote:I believe it's best to capture a 7-10k Barb city from a player who quit. This way it's quicker to get that city to start building scholars. Hopefully u can find one within 3 hrs range. Awesome Poll Btw.
Thank you. I've conquered the nearest small barbarian due to lack of a medium sized enemy/barbarian around. Will go for the second conquest soon.
[color="#FF0000"]Si vis pacem para bellum[/color]

Blackdeath550
Lancer
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 8:36 pm

Postby Blackdeath550 » Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:06 pm

Go for a city that is occupied but much lower first, and then, once you've got 2 cities, take down a big one.

Storm
Lancer
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:03 pm

Postby Storm » Fri Nov 25, 2011 3:12 am

What does distance to a city have to do with anything?
Why walk further?

Lordroy1985
Lancer
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:49 am

Postby Lordroy1985 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:50 pm

The longer the distance, the more loyalty regeneration takes place. If its too far, you have to use more than one scholar to take it ;-)

TheCommander
Lancer
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 8:22 pm

Postby TheCommander » Fri Dec 09, 2011 12:25 pm

I personally am going for the big fish. Me and my 60 member Guild are going to siege a 40,000 point city,
the strongest in our region.

It's good to be King; its the only way to pull stuff like this off. 

Montressors
Lancer
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:19 pm

Postby Montressors » Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:18 pm

I always go for players that have more points than me, it almost always pays out. If there aren't any around, i grab any 7k+ village nearby

Alexpelavas
Knight
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:57 pm

Postby Alexpelavas » Fri Dec 09, 2011 6:20 pm

i go for 15 k at least. usually near what my city is at when i attack. like if I'm at 20k i go for one like that. its easy just have your guild help you but can be hard to find one thats not an ally and close thats why i dislike low speed worlds haha

Skinnergary
Knight
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2011 12:23 pm

Postby Skinnergary » Thu Dec 29, 2011 2:48 pm

I'm a noob and want to know how to differentiate between a town/ village and a city I thought they were all cities also how do you know if a city has been abandoned . Cheers.


Return to “Strategy”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests