Quark Games forums

Exactly!!!

I understand there will always be a way around it. But it doesn't matter because there is a way around everything in life! But my point is that if we limit things it will create a factor of inconvinence that will discourage people to execute their loop holes.

It will encourage people to find the loopholes more! So they can dominate this game

Why not having to get to know your neibours and have to work to know who there guild is then manually pick from a list of guilds and enter it to that players info. Get rid of all ally and nap coulours so the only city's that are different are your guilds should make it difficult for guilds to keep up diplomatic talks when there players just attack who is on there Map until people then find what guild there all in then improve scout information to get estimates on what sort of a team they have and make the scout more of a valuable troop type then when players have entered all guilds players and found all there team they then become highlighted in red until the time when the losing team to surrender there territory and join the winning team or another team occupying the world then it all starts again scouts could give you clues to the players actions in game that could lead you to believe what guild there in maybe. just my thoughts I think it makes sense

Make the map smaller, like this:

R0 R1 R2
R10 R11 R12
R20 R21 R22

And all solo, people banding together will be banned. There wouldn't be much to monitor, so there would be less lag, etc.

I'm just tired of the mega alliances

If you can't beat em, join em!

JGree wrote:Make the map smaller, like this:

R0 R1 R2
R10 R11 R12
R20 R21 R22

And all solo, people banding together will be banned. There wouldn't be much to monitor, so there would be less lag, etc.

Have you not read what's been said? People will always find loopholes. So no guilds, no messages. People will still use kakao. No banding together. A couple joint ops here and there will just seem coincidence. And a few trades will seem the same. No attacks on each other can seem fear or coincidence. And then chain of events and you'll still have it. Just pointing it out

If you read my entire post, activity of BANDING TOGETHER will result in a ban. Because the map is smaller, it is easier to monitor and lag is reduced.

I'm just putting out suggestions, not what I want to see. I'm just trying to improve upon what everyone has already said. Suggestions is what this subforum was created for, so I intend to utilize it.

Did you read my full post? I said people will always find ways around. And then I have examples! You can't tell me that those wouldn't seem coincidence. Take that with kakao. And you'll have people beating the system anyway