Quark Games forums

like your thoughts fire

Thank you Mecha

It doesn't take 6 hours to go through 288 cities. I can go through that amount in 2 hours and do what needs to be done.

There should be an end game for a guild not 1 player. And to even battle it out with two people that have over 500 cities would take forever and probably never happen. Plus that is just boring. The only fun thing abou this game is playing with your guildmates.

Winners should only be top 3 guilds, not top 20 since in older worlds there is only top 4 guilds still active.

Yeah, but how many of those guilds dropped out because of boredom? The ending could be much sooner. I really don't see this game justifying more than a year.

In world 12 there is a player with over 1300 citys and over 30 miliion points.
Crazy ?!!

JudgeDredge are you gonna check in at W30 anytime soon?

The reason for the awards I stated are so others can see your accomplishments.

Once you have people with 100 cities or more, one no longer matters. So your Capitol can get a fourth level of zerker, who cares? I have fifty cities building level three! So you get one Royal Guard from your portal per day, or even every 6 hours. Who cares? I have 40 cities making guardians. It's not going to tip the scales. It's more like "wow, I've never seen that before. How did you get it?"

They will know you accomplished something.

I understand your point. Now, if you're talking about the reward being in that world, great! A fourth level in one city or even a handful, great! But when you get permanent support from accomplishments in the beginning of a world, that does throw the balance off. If it's temporary though, sounds great! Maybe add another medal even with maybe a gold amount with it?

I don't think allowing one person to win several worlds would be fair, and giving hold would be upsetting more of the balance between gold and non gold users.

Except that lots of people who are strong forces, don't use gold. So it gives an incentive to play